mirror of
https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-official.git
synced 2026-05-04 10:09:47 +00:00
Add code-modernization plugin
Structured workflow (assess → map → extract-rules → reimagine → transform → harden) and specialist agents (legacy-analyst, business-rules-extractor, architecture-critic, security-auditor, test-engineer) for modernizing legacy codebases into current stacks.
This commit is contained in:
66
plugins/code-modernization/commands/modernize-map.md
Normal file
66
plugins/code-modernization/commands/modernize-map.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Dependency & topology mapping — call graphs, data lineage, batch flows, rendered as navigable diagrams
|
||||
argument-hint: <system-dir>
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Build a **dependency and topology map** of `legacy/$1` and render it visually.
|
||||
|
||||
The assessment gave us domains. Now go one level deeper: how do the *pieces*
|
||||
connect? This is the map an engineer needs before touching anything.
|
||||
|
||||
## What to produce
|
||||
|
||||
Write a one-off analysis script (Python or shell — your choice) that parses
|
||||
the source under `legacy/$1` and extracts:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Program/module call graph** — who calls whom (for COBOL: `CALL` statements
|
||||
and CICS `LINK`/`XCTL`; for Java: class-level imports/invocations; for Node:
|
||||
`require`/`import`)
|
||||
- **Data dependency graph** — which programs read/write which data stores
|
||||
(COBOL: copybooks + VSAM/DB2 in JCL DD statements; Java: JPA entities/tables;
|
||||
Node: model files)
|
||||
- **Entry points** — batch jobs, transaction IDs, HTTP routes, CLI commands
|
||||
- **Dead-end candidates** — modules with no inbound edges (potential dead code)
|
||||
|
||||
Save the script as `analysis/$1/extract_topology.py` (or `.sh`) so it can be
|
||||
re-run and audited. Run it. Show the raw output.
|
||||
|
||||
## Render
|
||||
|
||||
From the extracted data, generate **three Mermaid diagrams** and write them
|
||||
to `analysis/$1/TOPOLOGY.html` so the artifact pane renders them live.
|
||||
|
||||
The HTML page must use: dark `#1e1e1e` background, `#d4d4d4` text,
|
||||
`#cc785c` for `<h2>`/accents, `system-ui` font, all CSS **inline** (no
|
||||
external stylesheets). Each diagram goes in a
|
||||
`<pre class="mermaid">...</pre>` block — the artifact server loads
|
||||
mermaid.js and renders client-side. Do **not** wrap diagrams in
|
||||
markdown ` ``` ` fences inside the HTML.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`graph TD` — Module call graph.** Cluster by domain (use `subgraph`).
|
||||
Highlight entry points in a distinct style. Cap at ~40 nodes — if larger,
|
||||
show domain-level with one expanded domain.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`graph LR` — Data lineage.** Programs → data stores.
|
||||
Mark read vs write edges.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`flowchart TD` — Critical path.** Trace ONE end-to-end business flow
|
||||
(e.g., "monthly billing run" or "process payment") through every program
|
||||
and data store it touches, in execution order. If the `observability`
|
||||
MCP server is connected, annotate each batch step with its p50/p99
|
||||
wall-clock from `get_batch_runtimes`.
|
||||
|
||||
Also export the three diagrams as standalone `.mmd` files for re-use:
|
||||
`analysis/$1/call-graph.mmd`, `analysis/$1/data-lineage.mmd`,
|
||||
`analysis/$1/critical-path.mmd`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Annotate
|
||||
|
||||
Below each `<pre class="mermaid">` block in TOPOLOGY.html, add a `<ul>`
|
||||
with 3-5 **architect observations**: tight coupling clusters, single
|
||||
points of failure, candidates for service extraction, data stores
|
||||
touched by too many writers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Present
|
||||
|
||||
Tell the user to open `analysis/$1/TOPOLOGY.html` in the artifact pane.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user